Archive for earth system models

Improved method to identify and reduce uncertainties in marine carbon cycle predictions

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, September 26th, 2018 

Improved method to identify and reduce uncertainties in marine carbon cycle predictions

How well do contemporary Earth System Models (ESMs) represent the dynamics of the modern day ocean? Often we question the fidelity of biological and chemical processes represented in these ESMs. The fact is representations of biogeochemical processes in models are plagued with some degree of uncertainties; therefore, identifying and reducing such deficiencies could advance ESM development and improve model predictions.

An overview of several models with respect to each of the variables, using absolute (left) and relative (right) scores to determine the degree of uncertainty in relation to referenced datasets.

 

A recent publication in Atmosphere described the ongoing efforts to develop the International Ocean Model Benchmarking (IOMB) package to evaluate ESM skill sets in simulating marine biogeochemical variables and processes. Model performances were scored based on how well they captured the distribution and variability contained in high-quality observational datasets. The authors highlighted systematic model–data benchmarking as a technique to identify ocean model deficiencies, which could provide a pathway to improving representations of sub-grid-scale parameterizations. They have scaled the absolute score from zero to unity, where the red color tends toward zero to quantify weaknesses in the skill set of a particular model in capturing values from the observational datasets. On the other side of the spectrum, the green color signifies considerable temporal and spatial overlap between the predicted and the observational values. The authors also present the standard score to show the relative scores within two standard deviations from the model mean. The benchmarking package was employed in the published study to assess marine biogeochemical process representations, with a focus on surface ocean concentrations and sea–air fluxes of dimethylsulfide (DMS). The production and emission of natural aerosols remain one of the major limitations in estimating global radiative forcing. Appropriate representation of aerosols in the marine boundary layer (MBL) is essential to reduce uncertainty and provide reliable information on offsets to global warming. Results show that model–data biases increased as DMS enters the MBL, with models over-predicting sea surface concentrations in the productive region of the eastern tropical Pacific by almost a factor of two and the sea–air fluxes by a factor of three. The associated uncertainties with oceanic carbon cycle processes may be additive or antagonistic; in any case, a constructive effort to disentangle the subtleties begins with an objective benchmarking effort, which is focused specifically on marine biogeochemical processes. The tool in development will ensure we satisfy some of the Model Intercomparison Project (MIP) benchmarking needs for the sixth phase of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6).

 

Authors:
Oluwaseun Ogunro (ORNL)
Scott Elliott (LANL)
Oliver Wingenter (New Mexico Tech)
Clara Deal (University of Alaska)
Weiwei Fu (UC Irvine)
Nathan Collier (ORNL)
Forrest M. Hoffman (ORNL)

Filter by Keyword

acidification air-sea interactions AMOC Antarctica anthropogenic carbon aragonite saturation state arctic argo Atlantic atmospheric CO2 autonomous observing autonomous platforms BATS bcg-argo biogeochemical cycles biogeochemical models biological pump biological uptake bloom blue carbon bottom water calcification California Current System carbon-climate feedback carbon cycle carbon dioxide Caribbean CCS changing marine ecosystems changing ocean chemistry chlorophyll circulation climate change CO2 coastal ocean cobalt community composition conservation cooling effect coral reefs deep convection deep ocean deep sea coral diatoms dimethylsulfide DOC domoic acid dust earth system models eddy Education Ekman transport emissions ENSO enzyme equatorial regions estuarine and coastal carbon fluxes estuary EXPORTS filter feeders filtration rates fish fisheries floats fluid dynamics fluorescence food webs forams geoengineering GEOTRACES glaciers gliders global warming greenhouse gas Greenland Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Gulf Stream gyre harmful algal bloom human impact ice age ice cover iron iron fertilization isotopes katabatic winds kelvin waves kuroshio larvaceans lateral transport lidar ligands mangroves marine boundary layer marine snowfall marshes meltwater mesopelagic mesoscale metagenome metals methane microbes microlayer microorganisms microscale midwater mixed layer mixotrophy modeling mode water formation molecular diffusion NASA net community production new technology nitrogen nitrogen fixation nitrous oxide north atlantic north pacific nutricline nutrient budget nutrient cycling nutrient limitation nutrients ocean-atmosphere ocean acidification ocean carbon uptake and storage ocean color ocean observatories ODZ oligotrophic OMZ open ocean organic particles oxygen paleoceanography particle flux particulate organic carbon pCO2 PDO pH phosphorus photosynthesis physical processes physiology phytoplankton plankton polar regions pollutants primary productivity productivity pteropods radioisotopes remineralization remote sensing residence time respiration rivers Rossby waves Ross Sea ROV salinity salt marsh satellite scale seagrass sea level rise seasonal patterns sediments sensors shelf system ship-based observations sinking particles SOCCOM southern ocean south pacific speciation submesoscale subpolar subtropical subtropical gyres subtropical mode water surface ocean teleconnections temperature thermohaline time-series top predators trace elements trace metals transfer efficiency transient features trophic transfer tropical turbulence twilight zone upper ocean upper water column upwelling US CLIVAR velocity gradient ventilation vertical flux vertical migration vertical transport western boundary currents wetlands winter mixing working group zooplankton

Copyright © 2019 - OCB Project Office, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Rd, MS #25, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Phone: 508-289-2838  •  Fax: 508-457-2193  •  Email: ocb_news@us-ocb.org

link to nsflink to noaalink to WHOI

Funding for the Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry Project Office is provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The OCB Project Office is housed at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.