Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry
Studying marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles in the face of environmental change
  • Home
  • About OCB
    • About Us
    • Project Office
    • Scientific Steering Committee
    • OCB Subcommittees
      • Ocean Time-series Committee
      • US Biogeochemical-Argo Subcommittee
      • Ocean-Atmosphere Interaction Committee
    • Scientific Breadth
      • Biological Pump
      • Changing Marine Ecosystems
      • Changing Ocean Chemistry
      • Estuarine and Coastal Carbon Fluxes
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake and Storage
      • Ocean Observatories
    • Get Involved
  • Activities
    • Summer Workshops
    • Scoping Workshops
    • Other Workshops
    • Science Planning
      • Coastal CARbon Synthesis (CCARS)
      • North Atlantic-Arctic
    • Small Group Activities
      • Aquatic Continuum OCB-NACP Focus Group
      • CMIP6 Working Group
      • Fish Carbon Working Group
      • Lateral Carbon Flux in Tidal Wetlands
      • Metaproteomic Intercomparison
      • N-Fixation Working Group
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake Working Groups
      • Phytoplankton Taxonomy Working Group
    • Ocean Acidification PI Meetings
    • Training Activities
  • Science Support
    • Data management and archival
    • Early Career
    • Funding Sources
    • Jobs and Postdocs
    • Meeting Calendar
    • Meeting List
    • Outreach & Education
    • Promoting your science
    • Student Opportunities
    • OCB Activity Proposal Solicitations
    • Travel Support
  • Publications
    • Ocean Carbon Exchange
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Science Planning and Policy
    • OCB Workshop Reports
  • OCB Science Highlights
  • News

Artificial light from sampling platforms changes zooplankton behavior

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Monday, November 26th, 2018 

When designing sampling we make generally accepted assumptions that what we collect is representative of what is “normal” or naturally occurring at the place, time, and depth of collection. However, a recent study in Science Advances revealed that this might not be true. During round-the-clock shipboard sampling, lights used at night can actually be a form of pollution that disrupts the diel cycle of zooplankton vertical migration.

Effect of light pollution on krill from a ship (left), diel vertical migration in natural dark conditions (middle) and effect of moonlight (right). Figure by Malin Daase (UiT).

Using a Autonomous Surface Vehicle the authors documented zooplankton behavioral patterns of light avoidance never previously seen. The study compared results from high Arctic polar night (unpolluted light environment for an extended time), to near ship samples. During months of near constant darkness in the Arctic, there was still a diel vertical migration of zooplankton limited to the upper 30 m of the water column and centered around the local sun noon. Contrasting the results from light-polluted and unpolluted areas, the authors observed that the vast majority of the pelagic community exhibit a strong light-escape response in the presence of artificial light (both ship light and even headlamps from researchers in open boats). This effect was observed down to 100 m depth and 190 m from the ship. These results suggest that artificial light from traditional sampling platforms may bias studies of zooplankton abundance and diel migration within the upper 100 m. These findings underscore the need for alternative sampling methods such as autonomous platforms, particularly in dim-light conditions, to collect more accurate and representative physical and biological data for ecological studies. In addition to research cruises and sampling, anthropogenic light pollution from predicted increases in shipping, oil and gas exploration, and light-fishing are anticipated to impact the diel rhythms of zooplankton behavior all around the globe.

Authors:
Jørgen Berge (Norwegian University of Technology and Science; UiT The Arctic University of Norway)
Martin Ludvigsen (Norwegian University of Technology and Science; University Centre in Svalbard)
Maxime Geoffroy (UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Memorial University of Newfoundland)
Jonathan H. Cohen (University of Delaware)
Pedro R. De La Torre (Norwegian University of Technology and Science)
Stein M. Nornes (Norwegian University of Technology and Science)
Hanumant Singh (Northeastern University)
Asgeir J. Sørensen (Norwegian University of Technology and Science)
Malin Daase (Norwegian University of Technology and Science)
Geir Johnsen (Norwegian University of Technology and Science; Norwegian University of Technology and Science)

Filter by Keyword

acidification air-sea interactions AMOC anthropogenic carbon aragonite saturation state arctic argo Atlantic atmospheric CO2 autonomous observing autonomous platforms bcg-argo Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) biogeochemical cycles biogeochemical models biological pump biological uptake bloom blue carbon bottom water calcification California Current System carbon-climate feedback carbon cycle carbon dioxide Caribbean CCS changing marine ecosystems changing ocean chemistry circulation climate change Coastal ocean cobalt community composition conservation cooling effect coral reefs deep convection deep ocean deep waters diatoms dimethylsulfide DOC domoic acid dust earth system models eddy Education Ekman pumping Ekman transport emissions ENSO enzyme equatorial regions estuarine and coastal carbon fluxes estuary EXPORTS filter feeders filtration rates fisheries floats fluid dynamics fluorescence food webs forams geoengineering GEOTRACES glaciers gliders global warming greenhouse gas Greenland Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Gulf Stream gyre harmful algal bloom hotspots human impact ice age ice cover iron iron fertilization isotopes katabatic winds Kelvin waves kuroshio larvaceans lateral carbon flux lateral transport lidar ligands mangroves marine boundary layer marine snowfall marshes meltwater mesopelagic mesoscale mesoscale processes metagenome metals methane microbes microlayer Microorganisms microscale midwater mixed layer mixotrophy modeling models mode water formation molecular diffusion NASA net community production new technology nitrogen nitrogen fixation nitrous oxide north atlantic north pacific nutricline nutrient budget nutrient cycling nutrient limitation nutrients ocean-atmosphere ocean carbon uptake and storage ocean color ocean observatories ocean observing ODZ oligotrophic OMZ open ocean organic particles oxygen paleoceanography particle flux pCO2 PDO pH phosphorus photosynthesis physical processes physiology phytoplankton plankton polar regions pollutants primary production primary productivity pteropods remineralization remote sensing residence time respiration rivers Rossby waves Ross Sea ROV salinity satellite scale seagrass seasonality seasonal patterns sediments sensors shelf system ship-based observations sinking particles SOCCOM southern ocean South Pacific speciation submesoscale subpolar subtropical subtropical gyres subtropical mode water surface ocean teleconnections temperature thermohaline time-series top predators trace elements transfer efficiency transient features trophic transfer tropical turbulence upper ocean upper water column upwelling US CLIVAR velocity gradient ventilation vertical flux vertical migration vertical transport western boundary currents wetlands winter mixing working group zooplankton

Copyright © 2019 - OCB Project Office, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Rd, MS #25, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Phone: 508-289-2838  •  Fax: 508-457-2193  •  Email: ocb_news@us-ocb.org

link to nsflink to noaalink to WHOI

Funding for the Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry Project Office is provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The OCB Project Office is housed at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.