Archive for sediments

How environmental drivers regulated the long-term evolution of the biological pump

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Friday, January 22nd, 2021 

The marine biological pump (BP) plays a crucial role in regulating earth’s atmospheric oxygen and carbon dioxide levels by transferring carbon fixed by primary producers into the ocean interior and marine sediments, thereby controlling the habitability of our planet. The rise of multicellular life and eukaryotic algae in the ocean about 700 million years ago would likely have influenced the physical characteristics of oceanic aggregates (e.g., sinking rate), yet the magnitude of the impact this biological innovation had on the efficiency of BP is unknown.

Figure. 1. The impact of biological innovations (left) and environmental factors (atmospheric oxygen level and seawater temperature; right) on the efficiency of marine biological pump (BP). Temperatures are ocean surface temperatures (SST), and atmospheric pO2 is shown relative to the present atmospheric level (PAL). The BP efficiency is calculated as the fraction of carbon exported from the surface ocean that is delivered to the sediment-water interface. The results indicate that evolution of larger sized algae and zooplanktons has little influence on the long-term evolution of biological pump (left panel). The change in the atmospheric oxygen level and seawater surface temperature as environmental factors, on the other hand, have a stronger leverage on the efficiency of biological pump (right panel).

The authors of a recent paper in Nature Geoscience constructed a particle-based stochastic model to explore the change in the efficiency of the BP in response to biological and physical changes in the ocean over geologic time. The model calculates the age of organic particles in each aggregate based on their sinking rates, and considers the impact of primary producer cell size, aggregation, temperature, dust flux, biomineralization, ballasting by mineral phases, oxygen, and the fractal geometry (porosity) of aggregates. The model results demonstrate that while the rise of larger-sized eukaryotes led to an increase in the average sinking rate of oceanic aggregates, its impact on BP efficiency was minor. The evolution of zooplankton (with daily vertical migration in the water column) had a larger impact on the carbon transfer into the ocean interior. But results suggest that environmental factors most strongly affected the marine carbon pump efficiency. Specifically, increased ocean temperatures and greater atmospheric oxygen abundance led to a significant decrease in the efficiency of the BP. Cumulatively, these results suggest that while major biological innovations influenced the efficiency of BP, the long-term evolution of the marine carbon pump was primarily controlled by environmental drivers such as climate cooling and warming. By enhancing the rate of heterotrophic microbial degradation, our results suggest that the anthropogenically-driven global warming can result in a less efficient BP with reduced power of marine ecosystem in sequestering carbon from the atmosphere.

Authors:
Mojtaba Fakhraee (Yale University, Georgia Tech, and NASA Astrobiology Institute)
Noah J. Planavsky (Yale University, and NASA Astrobiology Institute)
Christopher T. Reinhard (Georgia Tech, and NASA Astrobiology Institute)

Water clarity impacts temperature and biogeochemistry in Chesapeake Bay

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Thursday, December 3rd, 2020 

Estuarine water clarity is determined by suspended materials in the water, including colored dissolved organic matter, phytoplankton, sediment, and detritus. These constituents directly affect temperature because when water is opaque, sunlight heats only the shallowest layers near the surface, but when water is clear, sunlight can penetrate deeper, warming the waters below the surface. Despite the importance of accurately predicting temperature variability, many numerical modeling studies do not adequately parameterize this fundamental relationship between water clarity and temperature.

In a recent study published in Estuaries and Coasts, the authors quantified the impact of a more realistic representation of water clarity in a hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model of the Chesapeake Bay by comparing two simulations: (1) water clarity is constant in space and time for the calculation of solar heating vs. (2) water clarity varies with modeled concentrations of light-attenuating materials. In the variable water clarity simulation (2), the water is more opaque, particularly in the northern region of the Bay. During the spring and summer months, the lower water clarity in the northern Bay is associated with warmer surface temperatures and colder bottom temperatures. Warmer surface temperatures encourage phytoplankton growth and nutrient uptake near the head of the Bay, thus fewer nutrients are transported downstream. These conditions are exacerbated during high-river flow years, when differences in temperature, nutrients, phytoplankton, and zooplankton extend further seaward.

Figure 1: Top row: Difference in the light attenuation coefficient for shortwave heating, kh[m-1] (variable minus constant light attenuation simulation). June, July, and August average for (A) 2001, (B) average of 2001-2005, and (C) 2003; difference in bottom temperatures [oC] (variable minus constant). Bottom row: Difference in June, July, and August average bottom temperature for (D) 2001, (E) average of 2001-2005, and (F) 2003. Data for 2001 are representative of low river discharge, and 2003 are representative high river discharge years.

This work demonstrates that a constant light attenuation scheme for heating calculations in coupled hydrodynamic-biogeochemical models underestimates temperature variability, both temporally and spatially. This is an important finding for researchers who use models to predict future temperature variability and associated impacts on biogeochemistry and species habitability.

 

Authors:
Grace E. Kim (NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center)
Pierre St-Laurent (VIMS, William & Mary)
Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs (VIMS, William & Mary)
Antonio Mannino (NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center)

A Methane-Charged Carbon Pump in Shallow Marine Sediments

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, June 3rd, 2020 

Ocean margins are often characterized by the transport of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, entering from the subsurface and moving towards the seafloor. However, a significant portion of subsurface methane is consumed within shallow sediments via microbial driven anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). AOM converts the methane carbon to dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and reduces the amount of sulfate that diffuses down from the seafloor towards a sediment interval known as the sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ). The SMTZ is where the upward flux of methane encounters the downward diffusive sulfate flux (Figure 1). While the mechanisms of methane production and consumption have been extensively studied, the fate of the DIC that is produced in methane-charged sediments is not well constrained.

In a recent study published in Frontiers in Marine Science, authors used existing reports of methane and sulfate flux values to the SMTZ and synthesized a carbon flow model to quantify the DIC cycling in diffusive methane flux sites globally. They report an annual average of 8.7 Tmol (1 Tmol = 1012 moles) of DIC entering the diffusive methane-charged shallow marine sediments due to sulfate reduction coupled with AOM and organic matter degradation, as well as DIC input from depth (Figure 1). Approximately 75% (average of 6.5 Tmol year–1) of this DIC pool flows upward toward the water column, making it a potential contributor to oceanic CO2 and ocean acidification. Further, an average of 1.7 Tmol year–1 DIC precipitates as methane-derived authigenic carbonates. This synthesis emphasizes the importance of the SMTZ, not only as a methane sink but also an important biogeochemical front for global DIC cycling.

Figure 1: A simplified representation of DIC cycling at diffusive methane charged settings.

The study highlights that regions characterized by diffusive methane fluxes can contribute significantly to the oceanic inorganic carbon pool and sedimentary carbonate accumulation. DIC outflux from the methane-charged sediments is comparable to ~20% global riverine DIC flux to oceans. Methane-derived authigenic carbonate precipitation is comparable to ~15% of carbonate accumulation on continental shelves and in pelagic sediments, respectively. These  pathways must be included in coastal and geologic carbon models.

Authors:
Sajjad Akam (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Richard Coffin (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Hussain Abdulla (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Timothy Lyons (University of California, Riverside)

What really controls deep-seafloor calcite dissolution?

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Monday, December 16th, 2019 

On time scales of tens to millions of years, seawater acidity is primarily controlled by biogenic calcite (CaCO3) dissolution on the seafloor. Our quantitative understanding of future oceanic pH and carbonate system chemistry requires knowledge of what controls this dissolution. Past experiments on the dissolution rate of suspended calcite grains have consistently suggested a high-order, nonlinear dependence on undersaturation that is independent of fluid flow rate. This form of kinetics has been extensively adopted in models of deep-sea calcite dissolution and pH of benthic sediments. However, stirred-chamber and rotating-disc dissolution experiments have consistently demonstrated linear kinetics of dissolution and a strong dependence on fluid flow velocity. This experimental discrepancy surrounding the kinetic control of seafloor calcite dissolution precludes robust predictions of oceanic response to anthropogenic acidification.

In a recent study published in Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, authors have reconciled these divergent experimental results through an equation for the mass balance of the carbonate ion at the sediment-water interface (SWI), which equates the rate of production of that ion via dissolution and its diffusion in sediment porewaters to the transport across the diffusive sublayer (DBL) at the SWI. If the rate constant derived from suspended-grain experiments is inserted into this balance equation, the rate of carbonate ion supply to the SWI from the sediment (sediment-side control) is much greater in the oceans than the rate of transfer across the DBL (water-side control). Thus, calcite dissolution at the seafloor, while technically under mixed control, is strongly water-side dominated. Consequently, a model that neglects boundary-layer transport (sediment-side control alone) invariably predicts CaCO3-versus-depth profiles that are too shallow compared to available data (Figure 1). These new findings will inform future attempts to model the ocean’s response to acidification.

Figure 1: Plots of the calcite (CaCO3) content of deep-sea sediments as a function of oceanic depth. Left panel: data from the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Right panel: data from the Southwest Pacific Ocean. The blue line represents predicted CaCO3 content assuming no boundary-layer effects (pure sediment-side control). The red line is the prediction that includes both sediment and water effects (mixed control), and the green line is the prediction with pure water-side control. The agreement between the red and green lines signifies that calcite dissolution is essentially water-side controlled at the seafloor. These results are duplicated for all tested regions of the oceans.

Authors:
Bernard P. Boudreau (Dalhousie University)
Olivier Sulpis (University of Utrecht)
Alfonso Mucci (McGill University)

Constraints on glacial overturning circulation and export production lead to answers about the carbon cycle

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Friday, January 4th, 2019 

One of the biggest unsolved mysteries in climate science concerns the dynamics and feedbacks of the ice age carbon dioxide (CO2) cycle.

At the height of the Pleistocene ice ages, the atmospheric CO2 concentration was about 1/3 lower than during the warm interglacial periods. Most scientists think that the CO2 that was missing from the atmosphere was in the deep ocean, but how and why remains unclear. In a study published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters, we compared different computer simulations of the ice age ocean with δ13C, radiocarbon (14C), and δ15N data from sea floor sediments.

We find that a weak and shallow Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (6-9 Sv, or approximately half of today’s overturning rate) best reproduces the glacial sediment isotope data. Increasing the atmospheric soluble iron flux in the model’s Southern Ocean intensifies export production, carbon storage, and further improves agreement with glacial δ13C and δ15N reconstructions.

Figure Caption: Depth profiles of global mean δ13C, calculated using only grid boxes for which there exists Last Glacial Maximum data. Blue: Weak Atlantic circulation; Red: Strong Atlantic circulation; Green: Collapsed Atlantic circulation; Dashed: Extra iron in the Southern Ocean; Orange: Last Glacial Maximum Data.

Our best-fitting simulation (blue, dashed line in the figure) is a significant improvement over previous studies and suggests that both circulation and export production changes were necessary to maximize carbon storage in the glacial ocean. These findings provide an equilibrium glacial state, consistent with a combination of proxies, that can be used as a basis for simulations covering the last deglaciation time period. Understanding the different states that the global climate system can transit, and the characteristics of the transitions, is crucial to project possible outcomes of current climate change processes.

 

Authors:
Juan Muglia (Oregon State University)
Luke C. Skinner (Godwin Laboratory for Palaeoclimate Research, University of Cambridge)
Andreas Schmittner (Oregon State University)

Filter by Keyword

abundance acidification africa air-sea interactions alkalinity allometry ammonium AMOC anoxia anoxic Antarctic anthropogenic carbon aragonite saturation arctic arsenic Atlantic Atlantic modeling atmospheric CO2 atmospheric nitrogen deposition authigenic carbonates autonomous platforms bacteria BATS benthic bgc argo bioavailability biogeochemical cycles biogeochemical models biogeochemistry biological pump biological uptake biophysics bloom blooms blue carbon bottom water boundary layer buffer capacity CaCO3 calcification calcite carbon-climate feedback carbon-sulfur coupling carbon cycle carbon dioxide carbon sequestration Caribbean CCA CCS changing marine ecosystems changing ocean chemistry chemoautotroph chl a chlorophyll circulation climate change CO2 coastal ocean cobalt Coccolithophores community composition conservation cooling effect copepod coral reefs currents cyclone DCM decomposers decomposition deep convection deep ocean deep sea coral deoxygenation depth diagenesis diatoms DIC diel migration dimethylsulfide dissolved inorganic carbon dissolved organic carbon DOC DOM domoic acid dust DVM earth system models eddy Education Ekman transport emissions ENSO enzyme equatorial regions error ESM estuarine and coastal carbon fluxes estuary euphotic zone eutrophication evolution export EXPORTS extreme weather events faecal pellets filter feeders filtration rates fish Fish carbon fisheries floats fluid dynamics fluorescence food webs forams freshening freshwater frontal zone functional role future oceans geochemistry geoengineering GEOTRACES glaciers gliders global carbon budget global warming go-ship grazing greenhouse gas Greenland groundwater Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Gulf Stream gyre harmful algal bloom high latitude human food human impact hydrothermal hypoxia ice age ice cores ice cover industrial onset inverse circulation iron iron fertilization isotopes jellies katabatic winds kelvin waves krill kuroshio land-ocean continuum larvaceans lateral transport lidar ligands light light attenuation mangroves marine heatwave marine snowfall marshes Mediterranean meltwater mesopelagic mesoscale metagenome metals methane microbes microlayer microorganisms microscale microzooplankton midwater mixed layer mixed layers mixotrophy modeling mode water molecular diffusion MPT multi-decade NASA NCP net community production new technology nitrate nitrogen nitrogen fixation nitrous oxide north atlantic north pacific nutricline nutrient budget nutrient cycling nutrient limitation nutrients OA ocean-atmosphere ocean acidification ocean carbon uptake and storage ocean color ocean observatories ODZ oligotrophic omics OMZ open ocean optics organic particles overturning circulation oxygen pacific paleoceanography particle flux pCO2 PDO peat pelagic pH phenology phosphorus photosynthesis physical processes physiology phytoplankton plankton POC polar regions pollutants prediction primary productivity Prochlorococcus proteins pteropods pycnocline radioisotopes remineralization remote sensing residence time resource management respiration resuspension rivers rocky shore Rossby waves Ross Sea ROV salinity salt marsh satell satellite scale seafloor seagrass sea ice sea level rise seasonal patterns seaweed sediments sensors shelf system shells ship-based observations silicate sinking particles size SOCCOM soil carbon southern ocean south pacific spatial covariations speciation SST subduction submesoscale subpolar subtropical surface surface ocean Synechococcus teleconnections temperate temperature temporal covariations thermocline thermohaline thorium tidal time-series time of emergence top predators total alkalinity trace elements trace metals trait-based transfer efficiency transient features trophic transfer tropical turbulence twilight zone upper ocean upper water column upwelling US CLIVAR validation velocity gradient ventilation vertical flux vertical migration vertical transport volcano water quality western boundary currents wetlands winter mixing zooplankton

Copyright © 2021 - OCB Project Office, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Rd, MS #25, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Phone: 508-289-2838  •  Fax: 508-457-2193  •  Email: ocb_news@us-ocb.org

link to nsflink to noaalink to WHOI

Funding for the Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry Project Office is provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The OCB Project Office is housed at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.