Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry
Studying marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles in the face of environmental change
  • Home
  • About OCB
    • About Us
    • Scientific Breadth
      • Biological Pump
      • Changing Marine Ecosystems
      • Changing Ocean Chemistry
      • Estuarine and Coastal Carbon Fluxes
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake and Storage
      • Ocean Observatories
    • Code of Conduct
    • Get Involved
    • Project Office
    • Scientific Steering Committee
    • OCB committees
      • Ocean Time-series
      • US Biogeochemical-Argo
      • Ocean-Atmosphere Interaction
  • Activities
    • Summer Workshop
    • OCB Webinars
    • Guidelines for OCB Workshops & Activities
    • Topical Workshops
      • CMIP6 Models Workshop
      • Coastal BGS Obs with Fisheries
      • C-saw extreme events workshop
      • Expansion of BGC-Argo and Profiling Floats
      • Fish, fisheries and carbon
      • Future BioGeoSCAPES program
      • GO-BCG Scoping Workshop
      • Lateral Carbon Flux in Tidal Wetlands
      • Leaky Deltas Workshop – Spring 2025
      • Marine CDR Workshop
      • Ocean Nucleic Acids ‘Omics
      • Pathways Connecting Climate Changes to the Deep Ocean
    • Small Group Activities
      • Aquatic Continuum OCB-NACP Focus Group
      • Arctic-COLORS Data Synthesis
      • BECS Benthic Ecosystem and Carbon Synthesis WG
      • Carbon Isotopes in the Ocean Workshop
      • CMIP6 WG
      • Filling the gaps air–sea carbon fluxes WG
      • Fish Carbon WG
      • Meta-eukomics WG
      • mCDR
      • Metaproteomic Intercomparison
      • Mixotrophs & Mixotrophy WG
      • N-Fixation WG
      • Ocean Carbonate System Intercomparison Forum
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake WG
      • OOI BGC sensor WG
      • Operational Phytoplankton Observations WG
      • Phytoplankton Taxonomy WG
    • Other Workshops
    • Science Planning
      • Coastal CARbon Synthesis (CCARS)
      • North Atlantic-Arctic
    • Ocean Acidification PI Meetings
    • Training Activities
      • PACE Hackweek 2025
      • PACE Hackweek 2024
      • PACE Training Activity 2022
  • Science Support
    • Data management and archival
    • Early Career
    • Funding Sources
    • Jobs & Postdocs
    • Meeting List
    • OCB Topical Websites
      • Ocean Fertilization
      • Trace gases
      • US IIOE-2
    • Outreach & Education
    • Promoting your science
    • Student Opportunities
    • OCB Activity Proposal Solicitations
      • Guidelines for OCB Workshops & Activities
    • Travel Support
  • Publications
    • OCB Workshop Reports
    • Science Planning and Policy
    • Newsletter Archive
  • Science Highlights
  • News

Archive for New OCB Research – Page 14

Arctic rivers as carbon highways

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Tuesday, June 16th, 2020 

Rapid environmental changes in the Arctic will potentially alter the atmospheric emissions of heat-trapping greenhouse gases such as methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2). A recent study on the Canadian Arctic published in Geophysical Research Letters reveals that spring meltwater delivery drives episodic outgassing events along the lake-river-bay continuum. This spring runoff period is not well-represented in prior studies, which, due to ease of sampling access, have focused more on summertime low-ice conditions. Study authors established a community-based monitoring program in Cambridge Bay and an adjacent inflowing river system in Nunavut, Canada from 2017-2018. These time-series data revealed that at the onset of the melt season river water contains methane concentrations up to 2000 times higher than observed in the bay from late summer through early spring (Figure 1 panel a). In addition, the authors deployed a novel robotic chemical sensing kayak (the ChemYak) in the Bay for five days in 2018 to densely sample water CH4 and CO2 levels in space and time during the spring thaw (Figure 1 panel b). The ChemYak observations revealed that river water containing elevated levels of both of these greenhouse gases flowed into the bay and outgassed to the atmosphere over a period of 5 days! The authors estimate that river inflow during the short melt season drives >95% of all annual methane emissions from the bay. These results demonstrate the need for seasonally-resolved sampling to accurately quantify greenhouse gas emissions from polar systems.

Figure 1: Panel a) Measurements of methane concentration in Cambridge Bay and an adjacent river showed strong seasonality; elevated concentrations were associated with river inflow at the start of the freshet. Panel b) Observations with the ChemYak robotic surface vehicle in Cambridge Bay revealed that excess methane was rapidly ventilated to the atmosphere following ice melt in the bay.

 

Authors
Cara Manning (University of British Columbia)
Victoria Preston (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Samantha Jones (University of Calgary)
Anna Michel (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
David Nicholson (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
Patrick Duke (University of Calgary and University of Victoria)
Mohamed Ahmed (University of Calgary)
Kevin Manganini (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
Brent Else (University of Calgary)
Philippe Tortell (University of British Columbia)

A Methane-Charged Carbon Pump in Shallow Marine Sediments

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, June 3rd, 2020 

Ocean margins are often characterized by the transport of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, entering from the subsurface and moving towards the seafloor. However, a significant portion of subsurface methane is consumed within shallow sediments via microbial driven anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM). AOM converts the methane carbon to dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and reduces the amount of sulfate that diffuses down from the seafloor towards a sediment interval known as the sulfate-methane transition zone (SMTZ). The SMTZ is where the upward flux of methane encounters the downward diffusive sulfate flux (Figure 1). While the mechanisms of methane production and consumption have been extensively studied, the fate of the DIC that is produced in methane-charged sediments is not well constrained.

In a recent study published in Frontiers in Marine Science, authors used existing reports of methane and sulfate flux values to the SMTZ and synthesized a carbon flow model to quantify the DIC cycling in diffusive methane flux sites globally. They report an annual average of 8.7 Tmol (1 Tmol = 1012 moles) of DIC entering the diffusive methane-charged shallow marine sediments due to sulfate reduction coupled with AOM and organic matter degradation, as well as DIC input from depth (Figure 1). Approximately 75% (average of 6.5 Tmol year–1) of this DIC pool flows upward toward the water column, making it a potential contributor to oceanic CO2 and ocean acidification. Further, an average of 1.7 Tmol year–1 DIC precipitates as methane-derived authigenic carbonates. This synthesis emphasizes the importance of the SMTZ, not only as a methane sink but also an important biogeochemical front for global DIC cycling.

Figure 1: A simplified representation of DIC cycling at diffusive methane charged settings.

The study highlights that regions characterized by diffusive methane fluxes can contribute significantly to the oceanic inorganic carbon pool and sedimentary carbonate accumulation. DIC outflux from the methane-charged sediments is comparable to ~20% global riverine DIC flux to oceans. Methane-derived authigenic carbonate precipitation is comparable to ~15% of carbonate accumulation on continental shelves and in pelagic sediments, respectively. These  pathways must be included in coastal and geologic carbon models.

Authors:
Sajjad Akam (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Richard Coffin (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Hussain Abdulla (Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi)
Timothy Lyons (University of California, Riverside)

Global change impacts soil carbon storage in blue carbon ecosystems

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, May 20th, 2020 

Vegetated coastal “blue carbon” ecosystems, including sea grasses, mangroves, and salt marshes, provide valuable ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, storm protection, critical habitat, etc.. Many of these services are supported by the ability of blue carbon ecosystems to accumulate soil organic carbon over thousands of years.  Rapidly changing climate and environmental conditions will impact decomposition and thus the global reservoir of organic carbon in coastal soils. A recent Perspective article published in Nature Geoscience focused on the biogeochemical factors affecting decomposition in coastal soils, such as mineral protection, redox zonation, water content and movement, and plant-microbe interactions. The authors explored the spatial and temporal scales of these decomposition mechanisms and developed a conceptual framework to characterize how they may respond to environmental disturbances such as land-use change, nutrient loading, warming, and sea-level rise.

Figure caption: Temperate salt marshes (MA, USA). Healthy salt marshes have lush stands of grasses (top). Storms can expose peat deposits that have been buried for thousands of years (bottom). The fate of this soil carbon is unknown, but some fraction will be respired by microbes and returned to the atmosphere as CO2.

Improved estimates of soil organic carbon in blue carbon systems will require better characterization of these processes from sustained data sets. Furthermore, incorporation of these decomposition mechanisms into ecosystem evolution models will improve our capacity to quantify and predict changes in these soil carbon reservoirs, which could facilitate their inclusion in global budgets and management tools.

Temperate salt marshes (MA, USA). Healthy salt marshes have lush stands of grasses (left/top). Storms can expose peat deposits that have been buried for thousands of years (right/bottom). The fate of this soil carbon is unknown, but some fraction will be respired by microbes and returned to the atmosphere as CO2.

 

Authors:
Amanda C Spivak (University of Georgia)
Jon Sanderman (Woods Hole Research Center)
Jennifer Bowen (Northeastern University)
Elizabeth A. Canuel (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)
Charles S Hopkinson (University of Georgia)

Light matters for biological pump assessments

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Thursday, May 7th, 2020 

Organic carbon produced during photosynthesis in the sunlit euphotic zone is transported to the deep ocean via the ocean’s biological carbon pump (BCP). Even small changes in the BCP efficiency changes the carbon dioxide gradient across the ocean‐atmosphere interface, thus influencing global climate. A recent study in PNAS demonstrate that prior studies that estimate BCP efficiencies at a fixed depth fail because they do not consider the varying depth of light penetration, which ultimately controls production of sinking organic carbon and varies by location and season. Subsequently, the fixed depth approach introduces regional biases and underestimates global estimates of BCP efficiency by two-fold (Figure 1). These new findings make the case for using euphotic zone‐based metrics rather than applying a fixed depth to compare BCP efficiencies between sites. Improved estimates of BCP efficiency will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms that control ocean carbon fluxes and its feedbacks on climate.

Figure 1: Carbon loss from the surface ocean shows more variability and is twice as high if measured at the depth where sunlight penetrates (left) vs. 150 meters (about 500 feet; right) where it is commonly measured. One Pg is 1015 grams with close to 6 Pg of carbon being transported to depth per year in left panel. In comparison, about 10 Pg C/yr is released to the atmosphere as a result of human activity.

 

Authors:
Ken Buesseler (WHOI)
Philip Boyd (IMAS Univ. Tasmania)
Erin Black (Dalhousie University)
David Siegel (University of California, Santa Barbara)

Also see: Tiny plankton drive processes in the ocean that capture twice as much carbon as scientists thought on The Conversation.

Featured on the cover of the PNAS May 5, 2020 issue:

Autonomous platforms yield new insights on North Atlantic bloom phenology

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, April 22nd, 2020 

Phytoplankton produces organic carbon, which serves as a major energy source in marine food webs and plays an important role in the global carbon cycle. Studies of phytoplankton seasonal timing (phenology) have been a major focus in oceanography, especially in the subpolar North Atlantic region, where massive increases in phytoplankton biomass (blooms) occur during the winter-spring transition.

Figure 1. Panel a: Each line represents the trajectory of a profiling Argo float deployed during the North Atlantic Aerosols and Marine Ecosystems Study (NAAMES) expeditions (12 total); the initial float deployment location is denoted by a filled circle. The bar chart (inset right bottom) indicates float deployment durations. Panel b: Seasonal climatologies of Cphyto (green), µ (blue), l (red), and r (grey) from Argo floats for all 4 regions (D1-D4 as indicated on map in Panel a).

Many hypotheses based on data from shipboard discrete sampling or satellite remote sensing have been proposed to explain drivers of phytoplankton bloom formation and dynamics. However, discrete shipboard sampling limits both spatial and temporal coverage, and satellite approaches cannot provide direct information at depth. To address this gap in spatiotemporal coverage, a recent study in Frontiers in Marine Science, applied bio-optical measurements from 12 Argo profiling floats to study the year-round phytoplankton phenology in a north-south section of the western North Atlantic Ocean (40° N to 60° N). The authors calculated phytoplankton division rate (µ), loss rate (l), and carbon accumulation rate (r) using the Argo-based Chlorophyll-a (Chl) and phytoplankton carbon (Cphyto) estimates. Latitudinally varying phytoplankton dynamics were observed, with a higher (and later) Cphyto peak in the north, and stronger μ–r decoupling and increased proportion of winter to total annual production in the south (Figure 1). Seasonal phenology patterns arise from interactions between “bottom-up” (e.g., resources for growth) and “top-down” (e.g., grazing, mortality) factors that involve both biological and physical drivers. The Argo float data are consistent with the disturbance recovery hypothesis (DRH) over a full annual cycle. Float-based mixed layer phytoplankton phenology observations were comparable to satellite remote sensing observations. In a data-model comparison, outputs from an eddy-resolving ocean simulation only reproduced some of the observed phytoplankton phenology, indicating possible biases in the simulated physical forcing, turbulent dynamics, and biophysical interactions.

In addition to seasonal patterns in the mixed layer, float-based measurements provide information on the vertical distribution of physical and biogeochemical quantities and therefore are complementary to the satellite measurements. This powerful combination of observing assets enhances spatiotemporal coverage, thus enabling us to better observe, compare, model, and predict seasonal phytoplankton dynamics in the subpolar North Atlantic.

 

Authors:
Bo Yang (University of Virginia)
Emmanuel S. Boss (University of Maine)
Nils Haëntjens (University of Maine)
Matthew C. Long (National Center for Atmospheric Research)
Michael J. Behrenfeld (Oregon State University)
Rachel Eveleth (Oberlin College)
Scott C. Doney (University of Virginia)

An Important Biogeochemical Link between Organic and Inorganic Carbon Cycling: Contributions of Organic Alkalinity

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, April 8th, 2020 

As a part of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), organic acid charge groups can contribute significantly to total alkalinity (TA) in natural waters. Such a contribution is termed as organic alkalinity (OrgAlk). Beyond being part of TA, OrgAlk represents an important biogeochemical linkage between organic and inorganic carbon cycling. In other words, the biogeochemical cycling of organic acid charge groups – i.e. their sources, sinks, and biogeochemical behaviors – directly impacts pH and carbonate speciation, which may ultimately influence air-water CO2 exchange and inorganic carbon fluxes. However, the effects of OrgAlk is often ignored or treated as a calculation uncertainty in many aquatic CO2 studies. How we treat and study OrgAlk may need a new paradigm under biogeochemical cycles.

Based on direct titration data of OrgAlk, the authors of a recent study conducted a comprehensive assessment of OrgAlk variability, sources, and characteristics in a sub-estuary of Waquoit Bay (Massachusetts). The sub-estuary is influenced by a salt marsh, groundwater input, and offshore water. Both the salt marsh and groundwater OrgAlk contributed up to 4.3% of the TA across all sampled seasons. Estuarine OrgAlk:DOC ratios varied across space and time, which suggests that their abundances are controlled by different biogeochemical processes. In addition, the study demonstrates the insufficiency of using a fixed proportion of DOC to account for OrgAlk, as well as the challenge of using measured pH, TA, and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) to estimate OrgAlk. The effects of OrgAlk in these waters are equivalent to a pH change of ~ 0.03 – 0.26, or a pCO2 change of ~30–1600 matm. If extrapolating OrgAlk results to other coastal systems ranging from estuaries to continental shelves, OrgAlk would exert a strong control on both carbonate speciation and, ultimately, air-sea CO2 fluxes. This study provides a new conceptual framework for cycling of OrgAlk species and associated links between DOC and DIC pools in coastal systems (Figure 1).

Figure caption: A conceptual model of organic alkalinity cycling in coastal systems. BioP and ChemP represent in-situ biological production and chemical production of organic acid charge groups, respectively. Alk denotes total alkalinity. Arrows with dashed lines indicate processes that were not studied in the present study. The values in the boxes of pH, pCO2, and buffer capacity represent the magnitude of OrgAlk effects on pH, pCO2, and buffer capacity in the range of OrgAlk% in TA observed in this study (0.9 – 4.3%).

 

Authors
Shuzhen Song (East China Normal University)
Zhaohui Aleck Wang (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
Meagan Eagle Gonneea (U. S. Geological Survey)
Kevin D. Kroeger (U. S. Geological Survey)

Little big exporters

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, April 8th, 2020 

In the Southern Ocean, coccolithophores are thought to account for a major fraction of marine carbonate production and export to the deep sea. Despite their importance in the ocean carbon cycle, we lack fundamental information about Southern Ocean coccolithophore abundance, species composition, and contribution to carbonate export.

Figure caption: Heliscosphaera carteri (left), Coccolithus pelagicus (right) and Emiliania huxleyi (bottom right, partially behind C. pelagicus) coccospheres retrieved from the subantarctic waters south of Tasmania. Image Ruth Eriksen, courtesy AAD EMU.

A recent study in Biogeosciences has generated annual observations of coccolithophore species composition and contribution to calcium carbonate fluxes at two sites that are representative of a large portion of the Subantarctic zone. Coccolithophores account for roughly half of the annual calcium carbonate exported to the deep sea. Notably, it is not the most abundant species (Emiliania huxleyi), but rather the less abundant and larger species (e.g. Calcidiscus leptoporus, Helicosphaera carteri and Coccolithus pelagicus) that make the greatest contribution to carbonate export to the deep sea. Since these larger species exhibit substantially different ecological traits from the opportunistic E. huxleyi, predictions of future response of Southern Ocean coccolithophore communities should not be based on the physiological results from experiments with E. huxleyi. Rather, new physiological response experiments of those less abundant, larger coccolithophore species are urgently needed to constrain responses of these important carbonate exporters to environmental change in the Southern Ocean. This study underscores the importance of phytoplankton ecological traits on the regulation of the marine carbon cycle and emphasizes the need for more species-specific studies to improve predictions of marine ecosystem response to ongoing climate change.

 

Authors
Andrés S. Rigual Hernández (Universidad de Salamanca)
Thomas W. Trull (CSIRO and ACE CRC)
Scott D. Nodder (NIWA)
José A. Flores (Universidad de Salamanca)
Helen Bostock (University of Queensland,)
Fátima Abrantes (Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere and CCMAR)
Ruth S. Eriksen (CSIRO and IMAS)
Francisco J. Sierro (Universidad de Salamanca)
Diana M. Davies (CSIRO and ACE CRC)
Anne-Marie Ballegeer (Universidad de Salamanca)
Miguel A. Fuertes (Universidad de Salamanca)
Lisa C. Northcote (NIWA)

Tiny, but effective: Gelatinous zooplankton and the ocean biological carbon pump

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, March 25th, 2020 

Barely visible to the naked eye, gelatinous zooplankton play important roles in marine food webs. Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Urochordata are omnipresent and provide important food sources for many more highly developed marine organisms. These small, nearly transparent organisms also transport large quantities of “jelly-carbon” from the upper ocean to depth. A recent study in Global Biogeochemical Cycles focused on quantifying the gelatinous zooplankton contribution to the ocean carbon cycle.

Figure 1. Processes and pathways or gelatinous carbon transfer to the deep ocean.

Using >90,000 data points (1934 to 2011) from the Jellyfish Database Initiative (JeDI), the authors compiled global estimates of jellyfish biomass, production, vertical migration, and jelly carbon transfer efficiency. Despite their small biomass relative to the total mass of organisms living in the upper ocean, their rapid, highly efficient sinking makes them a globally significant source of organic carbon for deep-ocean ecosystems, with 43-48% of their upper ocean production reaching 2000 m, which translates into 0.016 Pg C yr-1.

Figure 2. Mass deposition event of jellyfish at 3500 m in the Arabian Sea (Billett et al. 2006).

Sediment trap data have suggested that carbon transport associated with large, episodic gelatinous blooms in localized open ocean and continental shelf regions could often exceed phytodetrital sources, in particular instances. These mass deposition events and their contributions to deep carbon export must be taken into account in models to better characterize marine ecosystems and reduce uncertainties in our understanding of the ocean’s role in the global carbon cycle.

Links:

Jellyfish Database Initiative http://jedi.nceas.ucsb.edu, http://jedi.nceas.ucsb.edu-dmo.org/dataset/526852 )

 

Authors:
Mario Lebrato (Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel and Bazaruto Center for Scientific Studies, Mozambique)
Markus Pahlow (GEOMAR)
Jessica R. Frost (South Florida Water Management District)
Marie Küter (Christian‐Albrechts‐University Kiel)
Pedro de Jesus Mendes (Marine and Environmental Scientific and Technological Solutions, Germany)
Juan‐Carlos Molinero (GEOMAR)
Andreas Oschlies (GEOMAR)

Chasing Sargassum in the Atlantic Ocean

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, March 25th, 2020 

The pelagic brown alga Sargassum forms a habitat that hosts a rich diversity of life, including other algae, crustaceans, fish, turtles, and birds in both the Gulf of Mexico and the area of the Atlantic Ocean known as the Sargasso Sea. However, high abundances of Sargassum have been appearing in the tropical Atlantic, in some cases 3,000 miles away from the Sargasso Sea. This is a new phenomenon. Nearly every year since 2011, thick mats of Sargassum have blanketed the coastlines of many countries in tropical Africa and the Americas. When masses of Sargassum wash ashore, the seaweed rots, attracts insects, and repels beachgoers, with adverse ecological and socioeconomic effects. A new study in Progress in Oceanography sheds light on the mystery.

Figure 1. The hypothesized route of Sargasso Sea Sargassum to the tropical Atlantic and the Caribbean Sea. The solid black lines indicate the climatological surface flow, the dashed black lines indicate areas where there was variability from the average conditions.

The authors analyzed reams of satellite data and used computer models of the Earth’s winds and ocean currents to try to understand why these large mats started to arrive in coastal areas in 2011. A strengthening and southward shift of the westerlies in the winter of 2009-2010 caused ocean currents to move the Sargassum toward the Iberian Peninsula, then southward in the Canary Current along Africa, where it entered the tropics by the middle of 2010 (Figure 1). The tropical Atlantic provided ample sunlight, warmer sea temperatures, and nutrients for the algae to flourish. In 2011, Sargassum spread across the entire tropical Atlantic in a massive belt north of the Equator, along the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), and these blooms have appeared nearly every year since. Utilizing international oceanographic studies done in the Atlantic since the 1960s, and multiple satellite sensors combined with Sargassum distribution patterns, the authors discovered that the trade winds aggregate the Sargassum under the ITCZ and mix the water deep enough to bring new nutrients to the surface and sustain the bloom.

Improved understanding and predictive capacity of Sargassum bloom occurrence will help us better constrain and quantify its impacts on our ecosystems, which can inform management of valuable fisheries and protected species.

 

Authors:
Elizabeth Johns (NOAA AMOL)
Rick Lumpkin (NOAA AMOL)
Nathan Putman (LGL Ecological Research Associates)
Ryan Smith (NOAA AMOL)
Frank Muller-Karger (University of South Florida)
Digna Rueda-Roa (University of South Florida)
Chuanmin Hu (University of South Florida)
Mengqiu Wang (University of South Florida)
Maureen Brooks (University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science)
Lewis Gramer (NOAA AMOL and University of Miami)
Francisco Werner (NOAA Fisheries)

Can phytoplankton help us determine ocean iron bioavailability?

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, March 11th, 2020 

Iron (Fe) is a key element to sustaining life, but it is present at extremely low concentrations in seawater. This scarcity limits phytoplankton growth in large swaths of the global ocean, with implications for marine food webs and carbon cycling. The acquisition of Fe by phytoplankton is an important process that mediates the movement of carbon to the deep ocean and across trophic levels. It is a challenge to evaluate the ability of marine phytoplankton to obtain Fe from seawater since it is bound by a variety of poorly defined organic complexes.

Figure 1: Schematic representation of the reactions governing dissolved Fe (dFe) bioavailability to phytoplankton (a) Bioavailability of dFe in seawater collected from various basins and depth and probed with different iron-limited phytoplankton species under dim laboratory light and sunlight (b) (See paper for further details on samples and species)

A recent study in The ISME Journal proposes a new approach for evaluating seawater dissolved Fe (dFe) bioavailability based on its uptake rate constant by Fe-limited cultured phytoplankton. The authors collected samples from distinct regions across the global ocean, measured the properties of organic complexation, loaded these complexes with a radioactive Fe isotope, and then tracked the internalization rates from these forms to a diverse set of Fe-limited phytoplankton species. Regardless of origin, all of the phytoplankton acquired natural organic complexes at similar rates (accounting for cell surface area). This confirms that multiple Fe-limited phytoplankton species can be used to probe dFe bioavailability in seawater. Among water types, dFe bioavailability varied by ~4-fold and did not clearly correlate with Fe concentrations or any of the measured Fe speciation parameters. This new approach provides a novel way to determine Fe bioavailability in samples from across the oceans and enables modeling of in situ Fe uptake rates by phytoplankton based simply on measured Fe concentrations.

 

Authors:
Yeala Shaked (Hebrew University of Jerusalem)
Kristen N. Buck (University of South Florida)
Travis Mellett (University of South Florida)
Maria. T. Maldonado (University of British Columbia)

 

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Filter by Keyword

abundance acidification additionality advection africa air-sea air-sea interactions algae alkalinity allometry ammonium AMO AMOC anoxic Antarctic Antarctica anthro impacts anthropogenic carbon anthropogenic impacts appendicularia aquaculture aquatic continuum aragonite saturation arctic Argo argon arsenic artificial seawater AT Atlantic atmospheric CO2 atmospheric nitrogen deposition authigenic carbonates autonomous platforms AUVs bacteria bathypelagic BATS BCG Argo benthic bgc argo bio-go-ship bio-optical bioavailability biogeochemical cycles biogeochemical models biogeochemistry Biological Essential Ocean Variables biological pump biophysics bloom blue carbon bottom water boundary layer buffer capacity C14 CaCO3 calcification calcite carbon carbon-climate feedback carbon-sulfur coupling carbonate carbonate system carbon budget carbon cycle carbon dioxide carbon export carbon fluxes carbon sequestration carbon storage Caribbean CCA CCS changing marine chemistry changing marine ecosystems changing marine environments changing ocean chemistry chemical oceanographic data chemical speciation chemoautotroph chesapeake bay chl a chlorophyll circulation clouds CO2 CO3 coastal and estuarine coastal darkening coastal ocean cobalt Coccolithophores commercial community composition competition conservation cooling effect copepod copepods coral reefs CTD currents cyclone daily cycles data data access data assimilation database data management data product Data standards DCM dead zone decadal trends decomposers decomposition deep convection deep ocean deep sea coral denitrification deoxygenation depth diatoms DIC diel migration diffusion dimethylsulfide dinoflagellate dinoflagellates discrete measurements distribution DOC DOM domoic acid DOP dust DVM ecology economics ecosystem management ecosystems eddy Education EEZ Ekman transport emissions ENSO enzyme equatorial current equatorial regions ESM estuarine and coastal carbon fluxes estuary euphotic zone eutrophication evolution export export fluxes export production extreme events faecal pellets fecal pellets filter feeders filtration rates fire fish Fish carbon fisheries fishing floats fluid dynamics fluorescence food webs forage fish forams freshening freshwater frontal zone functional role future oceans gelatinous zooplankton geochemistry geoengineering geologic time GEOTRACES glaciers gliders global carbon budget global ocean global warming go-ship grazing greenhouse gas greenhouse gases Greenland ground truthing groundwater Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Gulf Stream gyre harmful algal bloom high latitude human food human impact human well-being hurricane hydrogen hydrothermal hypoxia ice age ice cores ice cover industrial onset inland waters in situ inverse circulation ions iron iron fertilization iron limitation isotopes jellies katabatic winds kelvin waves krill kuroshio lab vs field land-ocean continuum larvaceans lateral transport LGM lidar ligands light light attenuation lipids low nutrient machine learning mangroves marine carbon cycle marine heatwave marine particles marine snowfall marshes mCDR mechanisms Mediterranean meltwater mesopelagic mesoscale mesoscale processes metagenome metals methane methods microbes microlayer microorganisms microplankton microscale microzooplankton midwater mitigation mixed layer mixed layers mixing mixotrophs mixotrophy model modeling model validation mode water molecular diffusion MPT MRV multi-decade n2o NAAMES NCP nearshore net community production net primary productivity new ocean state new technology Niskin bottle nitrate nitrogen nitrogen cycle nitrogen fixation nitrous oxide north atlantic north pacific North Sea NPP nuclear war nutricline nutrient budget nutrient cycles nutrient cycling nutrient limitation nutrients OA observations ocean-atmosphere ocean acidification ocean acidification data ocean alkalinity enhancement ocean carbon storage and uptake ocean carbon uptake and storage ocean color ocean modeling ocean observatories ocean warming ODZ oligotrophic omics OMZ open ocean optics organic particles oscillation outwelling overturning circulation oxygen pacific paleoceanography PAR parameter optimization parasite particle flux particles partnerships pCO2 PDO peat pelagic PETM pH phenology phosphate phosphorus photosynthesis physical processes physiology phytoplankton PIC piezophilic piezotolerant plankton POC polar polar regions policy pollutants precipitation predation predator-prey prediction pressure primary productivity Prochlorococcus productivity prokaryotes proteins pteropods pycnocline radioisotopes remineralization remote sensing repeat hydrography residence time resource management respiration resuspension rivers rocky shore Rossby waves Ross Sea ROV salinity salt marsh satellite scale seafloor seagrass sea ice sea level rise seasonal seasonality seasonal patterns seasonal trends sea spray seawater collection seaweed secchi sediments sensors sequestration shelf ocean shelf system shells ship-based observations shorelines siderophore silica silicate silicon cycle sinking sinking particles size SOCCOM soil carbon southern ocean south pacific spatial covariations speciation SST state estimation stoichiometry subduction submesoscale subpolar subtropical sulfate surf surface surface ocean Synechococcus technology teleconnections temperate temperature temporal covariations thermocline thermodynamics thermohaline thorium tidal time-series time of emergence titration top predators total alkalinity trace elements trace metals trait-based transfer efficiency transient features trawling Tris trophic transfer tropical turbulence twilight zone upper ocean upper water column upwelling US CLIVAR validation velocity gradient ventilation vertical flux vertical migration vertical transport warming water clarity water mass water quality waves weathering western boundary currents wetlands winter mixing zooplankton

Copyright © 2025 - OCB Project Office, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Rd, MS #25, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Phone: 508-289-2838  •  Fax: 508-457-2193  •  Email: ocb_news@us-ocb.org

link to nsflink to noaalink to WHOI

Funding for the Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry Project Office is provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The OCB Project Office is housed at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.