Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry
Studying marine ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles in the face of environmental change
  • Home
  • About OCB
    • About Us
    • Scientific Breadth
      • Biological Pump
      • Changing Marine Ecosystems
      • Changing Ocean Chemistry
      • Estuarine and Coastal Carbon Fluxes
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake and Storage
      • Ocean Observatories
    • Code of Conduct
    • Get Involved
    • Project Office
    • Scientific Steering Committee
    • OCB committees
      • Ocean Time-series
      • US Biogeochemical-Argo
      • Ocean-Atmosphere Interaction
  • Activities
    • Summer Workshop
    • OCB Webinars
    • Guidelines for OCB Workshops & Activities
    • Topical Workshops
      • CMIP6 Models Workshop
      • Coastal BGS Obs with Fisheries
      • C-saw extreme events workshop
      • Ecological Forecasting – North American Coastlines
      • Expansion of BGC-Argo and Profiling Floats
      • Fish, fisheries and carbon
      • Future BioGeoSCAPES program
      • GO-BCG Scoping Workshop
      • Lateral Carbon Flux in Tidal Wetlands
      • Marine CDR Workshop
      • Ocean Nucleic Acids ‘Omics
      • Ocean-Atmosphere Interactions
      • Oceanic Methane & Nitrous Oxide
    • Small Group Activities
      • Aquatic Continuum OCB-NACP Focus Group
      • Arctic-COLORS Data Synthesis
      • BECS Benthic Ecosystem and Carbon Synthesis WG
      • Carbon Isotopes in the Ocean Workshop
      • CMIP6 WG
      • Filling the gaps air–sea carbon fluxes WG
      • Fish Carbon WG
        • Fish Carbon WG Workshop
        • Fish carbon workshop summary
      • Marine carbon dioxide removal
      • Metaproteomic Intercomparison
      • Mixotrophs & Mixotrophy WG
      • N-Fixation WG
      • Ocean Carbonate System Intercomparison Forum
      • Ocean Carbon Uptake WG
      • OOI BGC sensor WG
      • Operational Phytoplankton Observations WG
      • Phytoplankton Taxonomy WG
    • Other Workshops
    • Science Planning
      • Coastal CARbon Synthesis (CCARS)
      • North Atlantic-Arctic
    • Ocean Acidification PI Meetings
    • Training Activities
      • PACE Training Activity
  • Science Support
    • Data management and archival
    • Early Career
    • Funding Sources
    • Jobs & Postdocs
    • Meeting List
    • OCB Topical Websites
      • Ocean Fertilization
      • Trace gases
      • US IIOE-2
    • Outreach & Education
    • Promoting your science
    • Student Opportunities
    • OCB Activity Proposal Solicitations
      • Guidelines for OCB Workshops & Activities
    • Travel Support
  • Publications
    • Ocean Carbon Exchange
    • OCB Workshop Reports
    • Science Planning and Policy
    • Newsletter Archive
  • OCB Science Highlights
  • News

Archive for Uncategorized

mCDR Workshop September 27-30, 2022

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, September 21st, 2022 

Marine Carbon Dioxide Removal: Essential Science and Problem Solving for Measurement, Reporting, and Verification Workshop

September 27-30, 2022 (The University of Rhode Island)

The central goal of this workshop is to build the OCB community's capacity to conduct research to support the Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) of marine CDR by identifying priorities, pathways and best practices in this relatively new area.

Application deadline was August 1, 10am ET.

Learn more about the dual activity, and the workshop.

USCCSP-NACP CDR Workshop August 1, 2, 4 – sign up!

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Tuesday, June 14th, 2022 

The US Carbon Cycle Science Program and the North American Carbon Program are in the midst of planning a workshop on research opportunities, partnerships and investments of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR). The intended workshop participants include funders, scientists, policy-makers and practitioners with expertise, resources and/or capabilities to inform federal CDR research opportunities, partnerships and investments related to air, land, coasts and societal dimensions of CDR.

This virtual workshop will be conducted on Monday August 1, 2022; Tuesday August 2, 2022; and Thursday August 4, 2022. (Friday August 12, 2022 – hold for work sessions if needed).

If you are interested in participating, and/or would like to provide input into the workshop planning, please complete this Expression of Interest Form.

Register now: New Fish, Fisheries, and Carbon virtual workshop March 2023

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, March 2nd, 2022 

Fish, Fisheries, and Carbon – 3-part international workshop

DATES: 6, 8, and 9 March 2023

1) Register for the workshop here

2) Sign up for the Zoom links below

The primary aims of this workshop are to:

  • showcase emerging research by the international community on the interactions between fish and the carbon cycle, and the potential impacts of fisheries on carbon stores
  • explore the natural science and societal research that is needed to develop and implement policy to protect the role of fish in ocean carbon cycles

The workshop is open to all stakeholders including NGOs, civil servants, fishers, food industry and researchers. There is no fee to register or attend. The workshop will occur virtually over three dates, all at different times to encourage global participation. All sessions will be recorded and made available after the workshop. Participants may sign up to any or all of the following sessions:

Session 1: Fish contribution to carbon flux
REGISTER for session 1 Zoom
WHEN: 6 March 2023: 0800 PST, 1100 EST, 1600 UTC (GMT), 0200 7 March AEST

Session 2: Fishery impacts on carbon sinks
REGISTER for session 2 Zoom
WHEN: 8 March 2023: 0700 PST, 1000 EST, 1500 UTC (GMT), 0100 9 March AEST

Session 3: Societal impacts when managing fish stocks to protect carbon
REGISTER for session 3 Zoom
WHEN: 9 March 2023: 1400 PST, 1700 EST, 2200 UTC (GMT), 0800 10 March AEST

Each session will include a combination of invited plenary talks, lightning talks, and interactive breakout sessions.

Learn more here

Implementation of the Global Ocean Biogeochemistry (GO-BGC) Array: Request for Community Engagement

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Thursday, November 5th, 2020 

GO-BGC Executive Team*

On October 29, 2020 the National Science Foundation (NSF) approved a $53 million Mid-Scale Research Infrastructure (MSRI) grant to implement the Global Ocean Biogeochemistry (GO-BGC) Array – a sustained robotic network of profiling floats carrying chemical and biological sensors that will revolutionize our understanding of ocean biogeochemical cycles, carbon uptake, acidification, deoxygenation, and ecosystem health. Scientists at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, University of Washington, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, and Princeton University will use this grant to build and deploy 500 biogeochemical (BGC) floats around the globe (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Float deployment numbers by ocean basin for an approximately even distribution of the 500 U.S. floats. Actual float deployment locations will depend on close collaboration with international partners in effort to achieve an even distribution of the total 1,000 international BGC floats.

An extension of the Argo network for temperature and salinity, GO-BGC floats will be equipped with nitrate, oxygen, pH, backscatter, chlorophyll fluorescence, and, when possible, irradiance sensors and will be distributed globally in open ocean waters deeper than 2,000 m. Floats will “park” at 1,000 m depth for nine days before profiling from 2,000 m to the sea surface, which is consistent with the Argo protocol. Data will be posted to the Argo Data Assembly Centers, as well as the GO-BGC website, within 24 hours of satellite telemetry of each float profile. These real-time data will be of research quality and freely available. As many floats as possible will be deployed in conjunction with ship-based validation measurements in order to support continuing improvements in data processing and sensor performance, as well as to quantify the accuracy of the float data.

The 500 floats in GO-BGC will represent half the desired global number of 1,000 floats proposed in the Biogeochemical Argo Science and Implementation Plan (BAPG, 2016) for a global BGC observing system. As occurs in the Core-Argo program, we anticipate that an additional 500 floats will be deployed by international partners in the coming years, and many efforts are already underway.

The NSF MSRI grant focuses solely on the implementation of GO-BGC infrastructure and does not include funding for research. Successful use of the array will depend on community engagement via proposal pressure to conduct research. We, therefore, strongly encourage community members to begin planning to submit proposals to utilize profiling float data. As the GO-BGC project is just beginning, no floats have reached the water yet. However, there is a quality controlled set of data from the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) project, as well as a variety of other Biogeochemical-Argo data sets that are available now.  These data sets have been used in numerous studies and they are available to the community as an initial asset and as a guide for future planning.

The GO-BGC array will be implemented in phases. Critical logistical partnerships in this endeavor include those with regional field programs and the International Global Ocean Ship-Based Hydrographic Investigation Program (GO-SHIP), from which many of the floats will be deployed. While research cruises have been impacted significantly by the recent 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, planning is still underway and information about where GO-BGC floats are likely to be deployed in the coming years will be critical in guiding research proposal efforts (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Known deployment opportunities from GO-SHIP cruises in the next five years (US GO-SHIP solid; international GO-SHIP dashed). Pink lines show additional Year 1 opportunities from cruises outside of GO-SHIP, some of which occur annually.

We will disseminate more information and answer questions from the community about the project and implementation plans during a virtual Town Hall at the AGU Fall Meeting in December, 2020.

 

*GO-BGC Executive Team:
Kenneth Johnson, MBARI
Stephen Riser, UW
Jorge Sarmiento, Princeton
Lynne Talley, Scripps
Susan Wijffels, WHOI
Heidi Cullen, MBARI
Andrea Fassbender, MBARI
George Matsumoto, MBARI
Yui Takeshita, MBARI
Alison Gray, UW
Sarah Purkey, Scripps
Todd Martz, Scripps
David Nicholson, WHOI

NSF EarthCube Workshop for Ocean Time Series Data

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Monday, August 12th, 2019 
EarthCube Mtg Report cover

Download Workshop Report (PDF)

EarthCube time series -slider

Jump to

Venue and dates

Overview

Agenda

Participants

Organizers

Relevant resources

Venue and Dates

Venue: C-MORE Hale Center at the University of Hawai’i Mānoa campus  (PDF map), 1950 East West Road, Honolulu

The workshop commenced first thing in the morning on Friday, September 13 and ended at lunchtime on Sunday, September 15.

We are grateful to workshop sponsor NSF EarthCube and to the C-MORE Hale Center for hosting the workshop.

In preparation for this workshop, we developed a short survey to better understand the data challenges and needs of the ocean time series community.

View the survey results 

NSF EarthCube Workshop for Ocean Time Series Data
September 13-15, 2019 (Univ. Hawai’i, C-MORE Hale Center)

Rationale: Data synthesis and modeling efforts across ocean time-series represents an important and necessary step forward in broadening our view of a changing ocean and improving our return on investment in ocean time-series. Despite the advances achieved over the past decade, significant barriers remain that hinder work across time-series, including issues related to data access, discoverability, and metadata reporting. Furthermore, incorporation of ocean time series data into ocean and earth system models is currently limited due to the lack of a standardized data format and user interface

Scope and Goals: To begin addressing this problem, the Ocean Carbon and Biogeochemistry (OCB) Program (us-ocb.org) convened a small workshop with funding from NSF EarthCube in September 2019 (in conjunction with OceanObs19). The objective of the workshop was to conduct a gap analysis to identify missing data infrastructure that would increase time series data availability and use. This workshop aimed to provide a much-needed forum for discussion of key issues and barriers surrounding data discovery, access, and interoperability.

Participants strategized a path forward on the development of a common framework for shipboard ocean time series data and metadata reporting, and data management resources. The overarching objective of this workshop was to move the shipboard ocean time series community toward a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (“FAIR”) model.
Topics of discussion included (but not limited to) the following ocean time series cyber-infrastructure challenges:

- Establishing a common data model for reporting core time series variables (e.g., definitions, vocabulary, units, precision, associated errors, etc.)

- Establishing standardized metadata reporting guidelines and required fields to facilitate data discovery and re-use

- Improving interoperability among different databases/portals

- Mechanisms to streamline and simplify data submission to oceanographic data management entities (e.g., automation of the time-series data acquisition/upload process)

- Vision and framework for a dedicated time-series data interface that also includes user-friendly visualization and computation options

- Meeting the needs of a broader range of users for data synthesis and information products emerging from ocean time-series

- Application of unique identifiers (such as DOIs) to data sets to enable citation and crediting of data providers

Ocean Time Series Data Workshop Agenda

September 13-15, 2019
C-MORE Hale Center, Honolulu, HI

 

Friday, September 13

8:00-9:00   Breakfast
9:00-9:30   Welcome (Heather Benway, OCB/WHOI) and introductions around the room

PLENARY SESSION
Introduction/overview talks (15 min. talks with 5 mins. for Qs)
9:30   EarthCube overview (Danie Kinkade, BCO-DMO/WHOI)
9:50   FAIR data principles and initiatives (ENVRI-FAIR, GO-FAIR, Enabling FAIR data, etc.) (Justin Buck, BODC/NOC and Steve Diggs, UCSD/SIO)
10:10   Time series data challenges that hinder science (Angelicque White, UH)
10:30-10:45   Break

Insights from current data models (12 min. talks with 3 mins. for Qs)
10:45     Interconnecting ocean time series efforts and frameworks (Laura Lorenzoni, NASA)
11:00     Moving towards FAIR data principles with ERDDAP (Kevin O’Brien, NOAA/PMEL)
11:15     The Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI) approach to data and metadata (Wendi Ruef, Univ. Washington)
11:30     The international OceanSITES Eulerian Observing network (Johannes Karstensen, GEOMAR)
11:45     Use of controlled vocabularies: Potential applications to time series data (Adam Shepherd, BCO-DMO)
12:00     Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS) Ocean Thematic Centre (OTC) (Benjamin Pfeil, Univ. Bergen)
12:15     Ocean Best Practices (Johannes Karstensen, GEOMAR)
12:30-1:30    Lunch

Time series data integration and products (15 min. talks with 5 mins. for Qs)
1:30   Tools and approaches to facilitate data synthesis (Mark Schildhauer, NCEAS/UCSB)
1:50   International Group for Marine Ecological Time Series (IGMETS) overview and challenges (Laura Lorenzoni, NASA/USF)
2:10   Carbon relevant ship-based time series station synthesis – A data product pilot (Nico Lange, Univ. Bergen)

2:30-5:00   Small group discussions (participants self-select, coffee will be available if needing a break)

Group 1. Establishing a common data model for reporting core time series variables (e.g., definitions, vocabulary, units, precision, associated errors, etc.) (Chair: Justin Buck, Auditorium)

Group 2. Improving interoperability among different databases/portals for time series data (Chair: Mark Schildhauer, Agora Room)

5:00   Adjourn for the day, dinner on your own

Saturday, September 14

8:00-9:00   Breakfast
9:00   Group 1-2 report outs  (15 mins. for each chair)
9:30   Group discussion
10:00-12:30   Small group discussions (participants self-select, coffee will be available if needing a break)

Group 3. Establishing standardized metadata reporting guidelines and required fields to facilitate time series data discovery and re-use (Chair: Angel White, Auditorium)

Group 4. Streamlining and simplifying time series data submission (Chair: Danie Kinkade, Agora Room)

12:30-1:30   Lunch
1:30   Group 3-4 report outs  (15 mins. for each chair)
2:00   Group discussion

2:30-5:00   Small group discussions (participants self-select, coffee will be available if needing a break)

Group 5. Application of unique identifiers (such as DOIs) to enable time series data citation and credit to be attributed to data providers (Chair: Adam Shepherd, Table Outside)

Group 6. Meeting the needs of a broader range of users for data synthesis and information products emerging from ocean time-series (Chair: Laura Lorenzoni, Auditorium)

Group 7. Designing the ultimate time-series data interface that also includes user-friendly visualization and computation options (Chair: Lance Fujieki, Agora Room)

5:00   Adjourn for the day
6:30-8:30   Group dinner (Tiki’s Grill and Bar, 2570 Kalakaua Ave)

Sunday, September 15

8:00-9:00   Breakfast
9:00   Group 5-7 report outs  (15 mins. for each chair)
9:45   Group discussion
10:15   Break

10:30   Participants assist chairs to finish compiling recommendations from small groups and discuss format/outcomes (participants self-select for one breakout topic to assist with)

11:30   Full group discussion (issues and remaining Qs, next steps, assignments, etc.) – considering the following:

- Format of recommendations (best practices) – Ocean Best Practices to codify once finalized

- EarthCube guidelines/requirements?

- Dissemination to time series community for feedback

- Opportunities for peer-reviewed publication(s)

12:00   Closing remarks and adjourn
12:30   Lunch

Workshop participants

Jose Abella-Gutiérrez
jabella@cigom.org

Andrew Barna
abarna@ucsd.edu

Heather Benway
hbenway@whoi.edu

Annie Bourbonnais
abourbonnais@seoe.sc.edu

Justin Buck
juck@bodc.ac.uk

B. B. Cael
bbcael@hawaii.edu

Pat Caldwell
patrick.caldwell@noaa.gov

Fernando Carvalho Pacheco
fcarvalho.pacheco@gmail.com

Tara Clemente
tclement@hawaii.edu

Kim Currie
kim.currie@niwa.co.nz

Bjoern Fiedler
bfiedler@geomar.de

Lance Fujieki
fujieki@hawaii.edu

Ralf Goericke
rgoericke@ucsd.edu

Adriana Gonzalez Silvera
adriana.gonzalez@uabc.edu.mx

Joseph Gum
jgum@ucsd.edu

Dana Hunt
dana.hunt@duke.edu

Robert Izett
rizett@eoas.ubc.ca

David Karl
dkarl@hawaii.edu

Johannes Karstensen
jkarstensen@geomar.de

Danie Kinkade
dkinkade@whoi.edu

Nico Lange
Nico.Lange@uib.no

Ricardo Letelier
letelier@coas.oregonstate.edu

Laura Lorenzoni
laura.lorenzoni@nasa.gov

Mai Maheigan
mmaheigan@whoi.edu

David Nicholson
dnicholson@whoi.edu

Kevin O'Brien
kevin.m.o'brien@noaa.gov

Ben Pfeil
benjamin.pfeil@uib.no

Al Plueddemann
aplueddemann@whoi.edu

James Potemra
jimp@hawaii.edu

Janne-Markus Rintala
janne-markus.rintala@icos-ri.eu

Wendi Ruef
wruef@uw.edu

Mark Schildhauer
schild@nceas.ucsb.edu

Adam Shepherd
ashepherd@whoi.edu

Jim Todd
james.todd@noaa.gov

Ian Walsh
iwalsh@seabird.com

Angelicque White
aewhite@hawaii.edu

Timothy Whiteaker
whiteaker@utexas.edu

Workshop organizing committee

Heather Benway, Mai Maheigan, Mary Zawoysky (Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst./OCB)

Justin Buck (National Oceanography Centre/British Oceanographic Data Centre)

Rod Johnson (Bermuda Inst. Ocean Sciences/Bermuda Atlantic Time series Study)

Danie Kinkade, Adam Shepherd (Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst./BCO-DMO)

Laura Lorenzoni (NASA, Univ. South Florida)

Mark Schildhauer (Univ. California, Santa Barbara, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, NCEAS)

D. Sarah Stamps (Virginia Tech Univ./EarthCube liaison)

Angelicque White (Univ. Hawai'i, Hawaii Ocean Time series)

NSF liaisons

Hedy Edmonds (NSF Chemical Oceanography)

Mike Sieracki (NSF Biological Oceanography)

Relevant resources

Armstrong EM, et al (2019) An Integrated Data Analytics Platform. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:354. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00354

Bailey K, et al (2019) Coastal Mooring Observing Networks and Their Data Products: Recommendations for the Next Decade. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:180. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00180

Benway HM, et al (2019) Ocean Time Series Observations of Changing Marine Ecosystems: An Era of Integration, Synthesis, and Societal Applications. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:393. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00393

Buck JJH, et al (2019) Ocean Data Product Integration Through Innovation-The Next Level of Data Interoperability. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:32. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00032

deYoung B, et al (2019) An Integrated All-Atlantic Ocean Observing System in 2030. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:428. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00428

EarthCube Resources:

- EarthCube Resource Registry Presentation - https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dwIUliAurfFstWRSiY74UBoUSaJYlVvc/view

- Main GitHub Organization - https://github.com/earthcubearchitecture-ecresourcereg

Kaiser BA, et al (2019) The Importance of Connected Ocean Monitoring Knowledge Systems and Communities. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:309. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00309

Pearlman J, et al (2019) Evolving and Sustaining Ocean Best Practices and Standards for the Next Decade. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:277. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00277

Snowden D, et al (2019) Data Interoperability Between Elements of the Global Ocean Observing System. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:442. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00442

Steinhoff T, et al (2019) Constraining the oceanic uptake and fluxes of greenhouse gases by building an ocean network of certified stations: the ocean component of the Integrated Carbon Observation System, ICOS-Oceans. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00544

Tanhua T, et al (2019) Ocean FAIR Data Services. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:440. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00440

Science Highlight guidelines

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Friday, May 25th, 2018 

Your science highlight should use a narrative style and active voice to engage the reader (no verbatim sentences from your abstract or paper).

Your target audience is a broad scientific readership. You may submit one figure that conveys the key point of the paper, with a succinct caption. The figure (separate high res file) must be modified slightly from its published version to avoid copyright issues.

The text should include the following:

- A catchy title to draw in your reader

- Opening statement highlighting an unknown or a question (1-2 sentences)

- Key results/findings and approaches (with link to article) (3-4 sentences)

- What are the broader implications of this work? Why should federal/state/local gov't, funding agencies, citizens, stakeholders, educators, etc. care?  (1-2 sentences)

- Author name(s) and affiliation(s) - Style: Sam Smyth (University of Carbon)

- Twitter handles of authors and/or labs/institutions

Short backstories are welcome!

We schedule highlights as received and go through one round of editing before publication. Generally it's 2-3 months between sending a highlight and the next open publication date due to current volume. We look forward to receiving your piece! Questions?

A Report from the 2016 OCB Summer Workshop July 25-28, 2016 (Woods Hole, MA)

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Wednesday, October 19th, 2016 

The 11th annual Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry summer workshop, sponsored by NSF and NASA, convened 186 participants from July 25-28, 2016 at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Woods Hole, MA.

This year’s summer workshop featured the following six plenary sessions:

Plenary 1. EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing (EXPORTS)
Plenary 2. The biology of carbon export – New processes and approaches
Plenary 3. Recent advances in quantifying ocean carbon uptake
Plenary 4. Quantifying ocean carbon, oxygen, and nutrient cycles
Plenary 5. The Indian Ocean – Monsoon-driven biogeochemical processes
Plenary 6. Marine ecosystem thresholds and regime shifts

Day 1 kicked off with a presentation on the projected instrumentation and scientific capabilities of the NASA Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, and ocean Ecosystems (PACE) Mission, which segued into the first plenary session on the proposed NASA EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing (EXPORTS) field campaign. Speakers in this session provided an overview of both the EXPORTS Science Plan and the Implementation Plan. The session also featured three scientific overview talks on the EXPORTS science questions, the first of which highlighted the influence of ecosystem characteristics such as plankton community structure on organic matter export from the euphotic zone. The second talk focused on key processes in the mesopelagic zone that affect vertical transfer of organic matter to depth.

The third talk focused on how data generated by EXPORTS will reduce uncertainties in current and future estimates of export, including an overview of current modeling capabilities for different export pathways. The second plenary session of Day 1 was convened by  organizers of a recent NSF workshop and white paper on novel biological processes and pathways regulating organic matter export and degradation. Speakers in this session explored potential contributions of mixotrophs, marine microgels, and episodic events (e.g., jelly falls) to biological pump function, and provided an overview of our current observational capacity to quantify carbon export and monitor changes in the biological pump over a range of temporal and spatial scales. The plenary session closed with a community-sharing presentation describing the Carbon Flux Explorer, an autonomous float that can quantify and photograph particulate carbon fluxes. After the plenary sessions, graduate students provided short presentations about their research interests and then all participants convened for a welcome reception and poster session.

Day 2 opened with agency updates from NSF, NASA, and NOAA representatives. Speakers in plenary session 3 then described data- and model-based approaches for studying internal variability (interannual to decadal) and anthropogenic change in ocean carbon uptake, and explored the role of physical processes (e.g., subduction, mesoscale and submesoscale processes, etc.) in modulating ocean carbon uptake. A presentation on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) provided an overview of CMIP5 simulations of the ocean carbon cycle and how well these simulations reproduce anthropogenic CO2 uptake and natural variability in ocean CO2 associated with  the biological pump. To provide a broader range of spatial and temporal perspectives, the session included talks on land-ocean exchanges of dissolved carbon across coastal, estuarine, wetland, and riverine systems and differences in ocean carbon storage during the last ice age, as constrained by paleo-proxies of ocean ventilation and deep-sea oxygen concentrations. This session concluded with a community-sharing presentation on Carbon Hot Spot, a nascent process study to characterize biophysical interactions and quantify ocean carbon uptake in Western Boundary Current regions such as the Kuroshio Extension.

During the afternoon of day 2, speakers in plenary session 4 provided an overview of the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) project and newly emerging seasonally resolved ocean carbon data sets from biogeochemical sensor-equipped Argo floats, which are providing unprecedented constraints on wintertime air-sea CO2 dynamics in the Southern Ocean. The session concluded with a presentation on the rationale and plan for a global biogeochemical observing network based on Argo floats equipped with biogeochemical sensors to more effectively monitor changing ocean conditions. Immediately following the plenary session, communication professionals from COMPASS led interactive communication training workshops to help participants share their science across a broad range of audiences using various tools, outlets, and communication strategies. Participants reconvened in the evening hours for the inaugural OCB ocean festival, featuring recent documentaries on the Palmer LTER in Antarctica and the CARIACO time-series.

After a morning poster session on day 3, participants enjoyed a presentation and Q&A session on the 2015 UN Climate Conference in Paris. Then speakers in plenary session 5 delivered a series of talks on the complex physical oceanographic and climatic drivers that influence biogeochemistry and biological processes in the Indian Ocean, where scientists are amidst planning for the second International Indian Ocean Expedition (IIOE2). The session opened with an overview presentation on key physical oceanographic features and observing resources in the Indian Ocean. Speakers then addressed links between physics, climate, and biogeochemical processes such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC) distribution and dynamics, iron limitation, trace metal cycling and measurements from GEOTRACES, nitrogen fixation, and oxygen deficiency in different parts of the basin and associated effects on biology. The final presentation of the session focused on seasonally variable Indian Ocean boundary currents and their impacts on local ecology and biogeochemistry. Day 3 wrapped up with a presentation by the new US SOLAS (Surface Ocean Lower Atmosphere Study) representative to initiate discussion and brainstorm ideas to facilitate scientific exchanges and new collaborations on topical areas of interest to both OCB and SOLAS.
The final day of the workshop opened with a presentation on the proposed NASA field campaign Arctic-COLORS. The Arctic-COLORS science plan is undergoing revisions, so authors were seeking input from the OCB community. The final plenary session of the workshop, plenary 6, featured a series of talks on marine ecosystem thresholds and regime shifts. In this session, speakers explored phytoplankton response to natural climate variability and anthropogenic climate change (phenology, biogeography, community composition, etc.), implications of climate-driven changes in bloom phenology for higher trophic levels, ecological changes and associated shifts in benthic communities of the Pacific Arctic, and the development of tools such as early warning systems to identify and predict nonlinear shifts in ocean ecosystems. A separate 1.5-day meeting on Arctic-COLORS immediately following the OCB workshop provided an opportunity for more in-depth discussions and opportunities to gather feedback.

For more information, including links to plenary talks and webcast footage, please visit the workshop archive page or contact Heather Benway.

Biogeochemical Cycling of Trace Elements Within the Ocean: A Synthesis Workshop

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Sunday, September 18th, 2016 

  

Over 100 scientists from 12 nations met at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades New York, USA, on 1 – 4 August 2016 for a synthesis workshop on the Biogeochemical Cycling of Trace Elements within the Ocean. The workshop focused on setting priorities for utilizing GEOTRACES trace element and isotope (TEI) data sets to advance scientific objectives at the interface of marine biogeochemistry and ecology, and was jointly sponsored by the GEOTRACES and OCB Programs.

Workshop activities were organized around three scientific themes:
1. Biological uptake and trace element bioavailability,
2. Abiotic cycling and scavenging, including particulate and dissolved speciation, and
3. Export, recycling and regeneration

Following a series of plenary talks designed to stimulate discussion on these topics, participants spent the remainder of the workshop in smaller group discussions to identify knowledge gaps and develop ideas for synthesis activities and products that combine GEOTRACES TEI data with other biogeochemical and biological data sets.

Tentative activities and products include:
• estimating bioavailability of iron (Fe)
• testing hypothesis for Fe and light co-limitation in the deep chlorophyll maxima;
• exploring Redfieldian concepts using GEOTRACES data and ocean models;
• calculating community trace metal demand vs. supply;
• developing a synthesis paper on existing methods and current state of knowledge on ligand composition and cycling;
• comparing radionuclide-based tracer methods for estimating downward flux of carbon, nutrients and trace metals;
• combining TEI distributions with AOU and preformed TEI concentrations to differentiate biotic (e.g., respiration) and abiotic (e.g., scavenging, physical transport) removal processes;
• estimating elemental scavenging using partition coefficients (Kd);
• combining particulate TEI and beam transmission data to develop algorithms for particle distributions that affect TEI scavenging; and
• developing synthesis paper on TEIs in nepheloid layers.

To learn more about and/or contribute to these activities, please contact Heather Benway (OCB) or Bob Anderson (LDEO). For more information, visit the workshop website or view the plenary presentations.

Marine and Human Systems: Addressing Multiple Scales and Multiple Stressors

Posted by mmaheigan 
· Sunday, April 3rd, 2016 

Eileen Hofmann (Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA)
Lisa Maddison (IMBER IPO, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway)
Ingrid van Putten (CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia)
Javier Arístegui (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Islas Canarias, Spain)

The Integrated Marine Biogeochemistry and Ecosystem Research Project (IMBER) is developed around four research themes, which include: Key interactions in marine ecosystems; sensitivity to global change; feedbacks to the Earth system; and responses of society. When IMBER was initiated in 2005, the responses of society theme represented a new direction for global environmental change programs because it explicitly acknowledged the role of humans as both drivers and recipients of change in marine ecosystems. IMBER project-wide activities, regional programs and working groups have advanced the science associated  with each research theme. However, the strength of these activities has been in the identification of theoretical and methodological overlap among the themes, facilitating integration of ideas and synthesis of research outcomes, and highlighting new research directions.

The biennial IMBIZO (Zulu word for a gathering) is an important IMBER-wide activity for assessing current understanding of theoretical and empirical research at the local, regional and global scale, and pointing to future research needs. IMBIZO IV, held in October 2015 in Trieste, Italy, addressed linkages between marine ecosystems and human systems (Fig. 1). In particular, emphasis was on current systems understanding and approaches to predict the effects of multiple stressors, at multiple scales, on marine ecosystems and dependent human populations. A novel aspect of this IMBIZO was the focus on exposing the need for human systems to respond to changes and for governance systems to adequately guide these responses.

IMBIZO IV was developed around four workshops (Fig. 1) that addressed i) marine ecosystem-based governance, ii) upwelling systems as models for interdisciplinary global change studies, iii) integrated modeling to support marine socio-ecological systems under global change, and iv) regime shifts and their socio-ecological implications. Although each workshop had distinct objectives, all addressed aspects of climate, ecosystems and societies with a view towards integrating and synthesizing current understanding and highlighting approaches for developing innovative societal responses to changing marine ecosystems. The workshops were supplemented with plenary presentations that provided overviews of the state of understanding and research needs and joint sessions and debates that allowed cross-workshop interactions (Fig. 2).

Within the context of each workshop, questions were addressed that considered the challenges of multiple stressors, pressures, and drivers,  existing knowledge gaps, and the type of expertise needed to move forward. Some workshops also evaluated the need for paradigm shifts to adequately address particular research questions. The overall goal of each workshop was to determine how integration of the diverse array of knowledge and different  research outcomes for marine systems could be done to provide useful advice for policy and management.

The results of the individual workshops are being summarized in a variety of ways including white papers, synthesis papers, short communications, and special issues. However, the workshop results have common components with perhaps the clearest message being the need for continued conversations and exchange of information between scientists from different disciplinary backgrounds. To enable this dialogue to take place collaboratively and ultimately to develop workable solutions will mean that a common understanding of language will need to be developed and that jargon be avoided. Facilitating cross-disciplinary communication by domain experts will also help crucially important communication to management authorities and decision makers.

Aside from the need for good communication between scientists that straddle the physical, ecological and human domains, the different workshops considered the linkages and interactions between the driving forces (pressures-state-impacts-responses, DPSIR) and how these are understood and represented. For most marine systems, the system state, how much of what is present and where, can be described with differing degrees of certainty depending on location and factors such as monitoring intensity and accessibility. The connectivity and linkages between marine system components and driving forces are known from a theoretical perspective and for many systems these have been described quantitatively using different modeling approaches. However, there is considerable empirical uncertainty about how marine systems might respond to continued and cumulative anthropogenic stresses and how in turn, this may feed back to the human domain and affect, for instance, future food security.

Marine systems may not be generalizable, sometimes cannot be simply scaled up, or may not respond linearly to anthropogenic stressors. Regime shifts may occur that are not easily (or not at all) reversible, thus requiring adaptation by resource users. The governance system is crucially important in this context as it provides links to management, policy and regulatory systems that influence use of and access to marine resources. Governance institutions are ultimately responsible for the sustainable management of marine resources and any necessary reduction in the pressure exerted on the resources. These governance systems in essence close the loop between the natural and human systems. Natural, socio-economic, and governance systems need to be central to continued research efforts and inform all levels of decision making to ensure informed steps are taken.

Global environmental change is happening and will continue to affect ecosystems and alter the ecosystem services provided to humanity. The need for timely detection and attribution of these changes remains, especially where change is irreversible. Human systems and society at large are both creators of the many stressors that drive change in marine ecosystems as well as recipients of these changes. Human systems can drive positive changes through good governance aimed at reducing vulnerability, and enhancing adaptive capacity and resilience. It is clear that many knowledge gaps remain, in particular the way in which multiple drivers and stressors interact. Much work also remains to be done in further detailing and modeling the crucial dependencies between human and ocean systems. All of these uncertainties place limitations on the predictability of governance outcomes and risk unintended consequences and maladaptation if not addressed adequately. Outcomes from IMBIZO IV will provide guidance for these important research efforts for the next decade of IMBER research.

IMBER gratefully acknowledges the support provided by the OCB Program for IMBIZO IV and its ongoing support of IMBER activities.

Filter by Keyword

234Th disequilibrium abundance acidification africa air-sea flux air-sea interactions air-sea interface algae alkalinity allometry ammonium AMOC anoxia anoxic Antarctic anthro impacts anthropogenic carbon aquaculture aragonite saturation arctic Argo argon arsenic artificial seawater Atlantic Atlantic modeling atmospheric carbon atmospheric CO2 atmospheric nitrogen deposition authigenic carbonates autonomous platforms bacteria BATS BCG Argo benthic bgc argo bio-go-ship bio-optical bioavailability biogeochemical cycles biogeochemical cycling biogeochemical models biogeochemistry Biological Essential Ocean Variables biological pump biological uptake biophysics bloom blooms blue carbon bottom water boundary layer buffer capacity C14 CaCO3 calcification calcite calcium carbonate carbon-climate feedback carbon-sulfur coupling carbon budget carbon cycle carbon dioxide carbon export carbon sequestration carbon storage Caribbean CCA CCS changi changing marine ecosystems changing marine environments changing ocean chemistry chemical oceanographic data chemical speciation chemoautotroph chesapeake bay chl a chlorophyll circulation climate change climate variability CO2 CO2YS coastal darkening coastal ocean cobalt Coccolithophores community composition conservation cooling effect copepod coral reefs CTD currents cyclone data data access data management data product Data standards DCM dead zone decadal trends decomposers decomposition deep convection deep ocean deep sea coral deoxygenation depth diagenesis diatoms DIC diel migration diffusion dimethylsulfide dinoflagellate discrete measurements dissolved inorganic carbon dissolved organic carbon DOC DOM domoic acid dust DVM earth system models ecology ecosystems ecosystem state eddy Education Ekman transport emissions ENSO enzyme equatorial regions error ESM estuarine and coastal carbon estuarine and coastal carbon fluxes estuary euphotic zone eutrophication evolution export export fluxes export production EXPORTS extreme events extreme weather events faecal pellets filter feeders filtration rates fire fish Fish carbon fisheries floats fluid dynamics fluorescence food webs forage fish forams freshening freshwater frontal zone fronts functional role future oceans geochemistry geoengineering geologic time GEOTRACES glaciers gliders global carbon budget global ocean global warming go-ship grazing greenhouse gas Greenland groundwater Gulf of Maine Gulf of Mexico Gulf Stream gyre harmful algal bloom high latitude human food human impact hurricane hydrogen hydrothermal hypoxia ice age ice cores ice cover industrial onset inverse circulation ions iron iron fertilization isotopes jellies katabatic winds kelvin waves krill kuroshio laboratory vs field land-ocean continuum larvaceans lateral transport LGM lidar ligands light light attenuation lipids mangroves marine carbon cycle marine heatwave marine particles marine snowfall marshes Mediterranean meltwater mesopelagic mesoscale metagenome metals methane methods microbes microlayer microorganisms microscale microzooplankton midwater mixed layer mixed layers mixing mixotrophy modeling models mode water molecular diffusion MPT multi-decade n2o NAAMES NASA NCP net community production net primary productivity new ocean state new technology Niskin bottle nitrate nitrogen nitrogen fixation nitrous oxide north atlantic north pacific nuclear war nutricline nutrient budget nutrient cycling nutrient limitation nutrients OA ocean-atmosphere ocean acidification ocean acidification data ocean carbon uptake and storage ocean color ocean observatories ocean warming ODZ oligotrophic omics OMZ open ocean optics organic particles oscillation overturning circulation oxygen pacific paleoceanography particle flux particles pCO2 PDO peat pelagic PETM pH phenology phosphorus photosynthesis physical processes physiology phytoplankton PIC plankton POC polar regions pollutants precipitation predation prediction primary production primary productivity Prochlorococcus proteins pteropods pycnocline radioisotopes remineralization remote sensing repeat hydrography residence time resource management respiration resuspension rivers rocky shore Rossby waves Ross Sea ROV salinity salt marsh satell satellite scale seafloor seagrass sea ice sea level rise seasonal patterns seasonal trends sea spray seaweed sediments sensors shelf system shells ship-based observations shorelines silicate silicon cycle sinking particles size SOCCOM soil carbon southern ocean south pacific spatial covariations speciation SST stoichiometry subduction submesoscale subpolar subtropical sulfate surf surface surface ocean Synechococcus teleconnections temperate temperature temporal covariations thermocline thermodynamics thermohaline thorium tidal time-series time of emergence top predators total alkalinity trace elements trace metals trait-based transfer efficiency transient features Tris trophic transfer tropical turbulence twilight zone upper ocean upper water column upwelling US CLIVAR validation velocity gradient ventilation vertical flux vertical migration vertical transport volcano warming water clarity water quality waves western boundary currents wetlands winter mixing world ocean compilation zooplankton

Copyright © 2023 - OCB Project Office, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Rd, MS #25, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA Phone: 508-289-2838  •  Fax: 508-457-2193  •  Email: ocb_news@us-ocb.org

link to nsflink to noaalink to WHOI

Funding for the Ocean Carbon & Biogeochemistry Project Office is provided by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). The OCB Project Office is housed at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.